The Anteater Discussion Series is a student-led, student-created and student-oriented program designed to develop proactive, informed and conscientious citizens and future leaders by providing a forum for respectful and substantive discussion of contentious issues relevant in today’s world. The series will exemplify civil discourse within our campus community through organized discussion among student panelists, hosted by ASUCI. The topics selected for panel discussions will be relevant and interesting for students, staff and faculty**. A post-discussion reception will follow each event so participants can delve deeper into the topic, explore communication styles, or simply enjoy good conversation.
**The positions taken by panelists during the discussions do not necessarily reflect their personal viewpoints.
Students attending each event will need to present their UCI Student Net I.d.
October 16 – TBD
7-9 p.m. - Student Center
November 6 - TBD
7-9 p.m. - Student Center
This workshop series provides students with a unique opportunity to develop skills and ways of thinking about debate, argument, and persuasion in contemporary society. Each expert workshop presenter and facilitator focuses on a particular aspect of debate, from effective listening to considering multiple viewpoints. Join us for an interactive learning experience to help you consider how you might become more persuasive and argue more effectively.
Where: The Writing Center, Science Library 193
When: Thursdays, 5-6:30pm
Space is limited. RSVP for the workshop below.
Below are the dates for the workshop series.October 17 - “Do Wake the Neighbors: Navigating the Town Hall”
When we speak to public representatives, our words can echo throughout the community. Using examples drawn from UCI student activism, Writing Specialist Courtney Santos offers strategies for tactful and effective public comments and preserving social capital during local debates.
Courtney Santos, Writing Specialist, Center for Excellence in Writing and Communication
October 31 – "The Death of Halloween: How to Use Narrative History as Argument"
Tracing the genealogy of an idea or cultural practice can be more than an interesting historical exercise: it can be a powerful tool of persuasion. In this workshop we'll explore the history of Halloween and use that history to build an argument about American social dysfunction. Halloween, like other "carnivals" that transgress the normative order, has long served to vent the steam of cultural conflict. But in the context of "liquid modernity"—which sees the continual denaturing of normative structures and in which transgression becomes ubiquitous—the function of Halloween has atrophied, leaving the steam of conflict to build pressure unabated. Can Halloween still serve a cultural function for an "anti-culture"? If so, what are the implications for campus politics?
Justin Lee, Writing Specialist, Center for Excellence in Writing and Communications
November 14 – “Beyond Pro and Con: Complexity and Nuance in Argument”
This workshop uses a case study approach to map the topography of argument – situating personal positions among common ones. By tracking an issue to its origin and mapping where we personally first encountered it, participants are encouraged to ask rhetorical questions about how controversial issues are framed for the public, while locating their own assumptions about these common argument positions.